Mobile phone users under the age of 16 are extremely sophisticated, with deep brand experiences and preferences. This raises significant questions for network operators, handset manufacturers and service providers regarding how best to engage an increasingly important market segment. 

You could be forgiven for a sense of déjà vu. After all, rising mobile phone use amongst children is not a new phenomenon. As long ago as 2004 the Guardian was reporting growth in ownership amongst under-10s, [1] and media coverage concerning potential health concerns can be traced back even further. However, our ever-increasing reliance on, and immersion in, mobile phones and the digital services we use them to access, justify revisiting the topic. 

Recent data from GfK reinforces just how prevalent mobile ownership amongst under-16s has become (2.5 million 12-15 year olds, almost 9 in 10, now have one). Furthermore, this is the age group cementing the shift in behaviour from passive entertainment, such as television, to more active digital and online activities. [2] As such, it should come as no surprise that the value placed on their mobiles increases accordingly. 

It would be easy to assume these younger consumers are neophytes, new to the category with few preconceptions. Not the case. While 12-15s may be the first to acknowledge the importance of the technology, many of them are the same children the Guardian was reporting on five or more years ago. Instead, as many as 85% of those acquiring a phone are already on (at least) their second handset, and already hold the assortment of brand perceptions that follow this prolonged involvement in the category.[3] 

As established users, with a penchant for advanced features and functions (camera, music, and games usage are all high, alongside social networking, IM, and email), it comes as no surprise that entry-level handsets have limited appeal. While the majority (70%) of phones in this age group are being gifted, three-quarters (74%) of users were involved in the selection process, with medium and high-end handsets flourishing and above average spending. [3] Unsurprisingly therefore, style and functionality will be key to handset manufacturers, for whom it will be necessary to attract the end-user as much as the purchaser. 

The scenario facing operators is less clear. Selection of network and tariff, nominally a decision of less outward importance to younger consumers, remain primarily the domain of the purchaser (in contrast to handset, just 49% and 45% of 12-15 year olds influenced the choice of network/tariff respectively). How then, do operators approach these consumers? Given their focus on handset, clearly an appropriate and desirable range is a prerequisite. Beyond this however, high levels of gifting and relatively low interest in network/tariff imply it’s the gifter, as much as the end-user, who needs to be won over. 

Mary Robinson at GfK Telecoms Research Panels highlights the importance of the under-16 market for network operators: 

“Recent GfK findings for contract phones show that 83% of adults replacing their mobile chose to remain on the same network as before. With such high levels of loyalty in the adult market, the product propositions and brand experiences of the under-16s become massively important. Ignore them at your peril.” 

Ultimately, when this generation hits adulthood and consumption becomes self-sustained, they will already be sophisticated mobile users consuming a range of services and content. Harnessing their demand will be a key revenue stream in the future mobile marketplace, and the brand preferences already developing will play a significant role.

For handset manufacturers, operators and service providers, the prize is a significant one.

 For more information on the under 16 telecoms market please click here

[1] http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2004/apr/28/mobilephones.uknews

[2] http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=2199

[3] GfK Research Panels: Kids Mobile Phone Market Report Q110

PHOTO COURTESY OF:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/uberculture

  • Share/Bookmark

Google Chrome continues to muscle its way into the browser market as GfK data for January-June 2010 shows that it has a 7% share of the browser market. In June 2010 alone it accounted for a 9% share which is remarkable considering that it has only been in existence for 2 years.

To highlight the impact that Google Chrome is making we have compared Jan-Jun 2009 data against the same rolling months of 2010.

Compared to this time last year Internet Explorer has lost 12% market share while the Chrome and Firefox browsers have gained some ground. The bad publicity around Internet Explorer and its security flaws combined with the EU enforced browser ballot cannot have done Internet Explorer any favours. Google Chrome is taking full advantage and eating its way into Internet Explorer at a rapid rate and there is no doubt that they want to do the same to Firefox

Similar to our findings in the last browser update it is the younger age groups that continue to push Google Chrome. GfK data for June 2010 shows that 37% of Chrome users are aged 16-24. When considering that 70% of people in this age group spend 20 or more hours on the internet per week – there are a lot of hours being spent on the internet via Google Chrome.

Feel free to take a look at the latest GfK browser statistics here.

The GfK figures align closely with the figures reported by StatsCounter and Net Applications. Although GfK data is only based on UK browser market share it has an added advantage of also containing important demographic information which is unavailable elsewhere (age, gender, UK region, marital status, time spent on the internet). From our data we know that only 25% of people in full time education are using Internet Explorer. If you are interesting in getting some more of this data then please feel free to contact GfK NOP Technology.

How we collect the data

Each month GfK NOP conduct a UK based online survey among UK adults aged 16 and over. The sample is representative of UK adults who use the internet ten hours or more per month. It is important to note that we do not ask a question about which browser the respondent uses, instead, our servers determine the respondent’s browser used to complete the survey. This data is therefore more robust than stated survey data as it is based on actual usage.

Monthly sample size; June 2010 (n=1224)

Jan-Jun 2009 (n=5763)

Jan-Jun 2010 (n=7360)

  • Share/Bookmark

A recent GfK NOP Technology report shows consumers’ love affair with mobile phone applications has turned from a dalliance into a settled and dependable relationship. With a fifth of smartphone users downloading more apps than six months ago, mobile applications may soon replace browsers as the main gateway to the web for mobile phone users.

To read the full GfK NOP Technology report click here

  • Share/Bookmark

The FIFA World Cup is finally upon us and while football fans, vuvuzelas aside, have been enjoying the first week of games, employers have a difficult decision to make when it comes to England’s game against Slovenia on Wednesday 23 June at 3pm UK time. Passionate debates about football are all too common, but there is one debate that takes place every four years – namely whether employers should give their staff time off to watch their national team play in the World Cup.

GfK data shows that 5% of employees are going to be allowed time off or be granted flexible working hours to fit around England’s match against Slovenia (this includes GfK NOP). Although this seems fairly small it still shows that employers are willing to let their staff take time off because of a football fixture. Most companies will doubtless have already made their decision regarding their position on this matter, but for the few remaining who are yet to make an official announcement, we would urge that they give the go ahead to watch the match.

Employers allowing their staff to watch the game or arrange flexible working around it will not only have made the correct decision for their football loving employees, but more importantly they have made the correct decision for their business. GfK data shows that 78% of staff allowed to watch the game away from their desk will feel more positive towards their employer, with 68% of the same group also saying that they feel more motivated to work during a World Cup.

Employers may lose their headcount for what will effectively amount to a full afternoon, but the benefits from doing so will help to keep their workforce engaged during June and July this year: employers allowing their staff to watch the game will be rewarded with a motivated and productive workforce whilst positively enhancing their image as an employer.

Conversely, our survey data shows that not allowing time off may have a negative impact on a business – 20% of employees not being given time off to watch the game say they now feel more negatively towards their employer, and  17% of respondents state they will feel less motivated as a result of the decision. Furthermore, the majority of those not allowed are likely to be watching the game anyway – the growth in streaming live content through the internet means that watching the match at work is really only a few clicks away. For the 7% of employees who are not allowed time off work  this could be an option that has previously been impossible.

A lot has been made about employees streaming the action from South Africa through their PC or mobile device and crippling the networks within their office walls. So much in fact that FIFA has installed 75 supercomputers in the town of Slough to cope with increased data usage*. The precautions taken by FIFA may not be fully justified as GfK data shows that 23% of those not granted time off work will be listening to live radio commentary while streaming via PC and mobile will only account for 9% and 3% respectively.

With companies already having taken a stance on the issue of the World Cup it is clear to see that those employers officially allowing their staff to watch the game will reap the benefits for the business in the long term and boost company loyalty.  It’s really a no-brainer – although whether people actually want to watch the match following England’s terrible performance against Algeria is less of a certainty…

* Sources for used figures & quotations:

http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/fifa-houses-75-supercomputers-in-uk-for-world-cup-693600

RESEARCH NOTES:

GfK NOP Technology conducted a survey among 996 UK adults in June 2010. The interviews were conducted online and are representative on UK adults who have access to the internet.

Image From:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/shine2010/4615577330/

  • Share/Bookmark

Growth returns to Western European consumer technology markets in Q1 2010. GfK TEMAX data shows that consumers are more willing to upgrade their home technology as well as experiment with new smartphone mobile technology.

GfK TEMAX data shows that, overall, the consumer technology market recorded 2.7% growth in Q1 this year compared to Q1 in 2009. Key technology sectors have recorded year on year growth, including Telecommunications (+4.9%), Information Technology (+3.6%) and Consumer Electronics (+0.7%) in Q1 2010. Smartphones, Windows 7 and LCD TVs are all driving factors of growth in their respective sectors.

Smartphones continue to drive growth in the Telecommunications market

While the telecommunications market declined by -3.2% in the fourth quarter 2009, the first quarter of 2010 returned to growth with a +4.9% increase year on year.

Growth in the telecommunications sector is being driven by the increasing demand for Smartphones as they make up 40% of the total sales value. In Western Europe one in five handsets sold runs a mobile operating system and uses a touchscreen or QWERTY keyboard as an input interface. Mobile Operating Systems include Symbian 60, Windows Mobile, Linux, Android, iPhone OS, RIM and Palm WebOS.

Internet access has become “ubiquitous” which is driving interest in mobile services to a much broader audience. Mobile email is becoming the alternative to the well perceived SMS services and navigation software often come pre-installed on the devices. Social networks have become the most popular apps on smartphones, adding more relevance and immediacy the PC at home. Furthermore, many of these mobile operating systems are also being used on netbooks and tablet PCs, which are being sold through network operators with 3G connectivity.

With a wide range of innovative, new smartphones showcased at the Mobile World Congress earlier this year and the recent interest in tablet PCs, growth in the telecommunications sector is likely to continue throughout 2010.

Windows 7 ignites upgrade cycle in the Information Technology market

The Information Technology market, the second biggest market behind Consumer Electronics in Western Europe, grew by +3.6% in Q1 2010 and is now worth EUR 11.5 billion.

Consumer demand is focusing on Mobile Computers, but also on accessories, peripherals, software and especially All-In-One-Desktop Computers too. The successful introduction of Windows 7 initiated a new replacement and upgrade cycle. Lots of consumers leapfrogged Vista, staying with existing installed hardware, software and even accessories and peripherals. Overlooking Vista led to many installed products being outdated upon the arrival of Windows 7, thus consumers were “ready” for an update. As consumers are becoming more aware, they are looking for a wide product range. As a consequence expectations for 2010 are positive following this trend in consumers’ attitude.

Strong demand for LCD-TV’s returns growth back to the Consumer Electronics market

Consumer Electronics, the largest technology sector in Western Europe, recorded year on year growth of +0.7% in Q1 2010. The impact of the recession on the Consumer Electronics markets no longer exists as demand for LCD TVs strengthens for three key reasons.

Firstly, most countries in Europe have a huge consumer demand for replacing the old CRT-TV with a new flat LCD-TV. Of course, the World Cup in South Africa is supporting this trend and quickening the desire to replace old TV sets. With the stabilisation of prices over the past months, the revenue situation also saw an improvement.

Secondly, the digital switch over is another contributing factor to the growth in this market. With analogue TV being phased out, new set top boxes or even a new TV set are required to receive digital TV channels. This development is most strongly observed in Spain (+16%), Italy (+6.9%) and Portugal (+4.4%). Home entertainment in general gained importance with better HiFi products or “TV ecosystems” becoming increasingly popular. Positive and substantial impulses were seen from Blu-ray, Home Theatre Sets, Loudspeaker Sets and of course High Definition set top boxes.

Finally, consumers’ willingness to invest in flat screens, HD and better sound systems for the home, is a clear sign of the “homing-trend”. This willingness-to-invest combined with the anticipated impact of the World Cup  gives reason to expect an even better second quarter 2010.

2010 consumer technology outlook is positive

In addition, GfK TEMAX covers other consumer technology sectors in Western Europe and all but one experienced growth. Other technology sectors that grew in Q1 were Photography (+2.7%), Major Domestic Appliances (+ 4.1%) and Small Domestic Appliances (+6.5%), but Office Equipment and Consumables sector contracted -1.2% compared to the same period in 2009.

These positive growth figures in Q1 are likely to continue throughout the year and Michael Sauter, head of GfK TEMAX, comments that:

“The first signs for April are looking positive. Our data show the Technical Consumer Goods market continuing on the road to recovery, indicating more growth to come in Q2-2010.”

Check back in July for the latest data and analysis from GfK TEMAX

ABOUT GfK TEMAX

GfK TEMAX® is an index developed by GfK Retail and Technology to track the consumer durables markets. GfK TEMAX® is published internationally. The findings are based on surveys carried out by the retail panel of GfK Retail and Technology. The retail panel comprises data from over 340,000 retail outlets worldwide. Click here for all reports and press releases

PHOTO COURTESY OF

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ndevil/

  • Share/Bookmark

Apple is a leading force in the smartphone market because they simplify services and enable people to fit their world in their pocket.

Yesterday, Steve Jobs announced the latest iPhone 4 at WWDC but what struck me was the way he structured his presentation. Jobs focused early on about the success of the App Store for both consumers and developers. There is now 225,000 apps available, 5 billion downloads and Apple has paid out $1 billion dollars to developers. Apple has created a vibrant market place for mobile apps and services with more big brands to launch later this year. That is success unrivalled by anyone.

To cover all this first was smart because Jobs was focusing on the services and the benefits of owning (or developing content for) an iPhone. After all the device features are becoming less important over time whereas services and content is increasingly driving consumer demand in the smartphone (as opposed to the feature phone) market.

Apple have understood this for years because nothing about the iPhone 4 is particularly new, multitasking, video calling, high resolution screens and cameras have been around for a while. Whilst other smartphone makers have focused on handset features Apple have focused on what the consumer can do with their phone. These are very different strategies and Apple has clearly chosen the right path.

The really clever thing that Apple does is the way they take old features, like multitasking, simplify them and re-package them as if they have just been invented for the first time. By making features like these easy to use, those who aren’t particularly tech savvy believe that Apple invented them. Apple did exactly this with Apps, they made them easily accessible, streamlined the purchase and installation process and most importantly made the content exciting and relevant. A recent tweet from Steve Jobs exemplifies this perfectly:

“No one used computers until Macintosh. No one listened to MP3 players until iPod. No one made video calls until iPhone 4″

However, unlike a few years ago, there are now many strong competitors to the iPhone. There are many Android based alternatives that offer tightly integrated services, varied apps and some argue better features. Nokia will be launching their revamped version of Symbian OS on the N8 and Microsoft will also be introducing Windows Phone 7 towards the end of 2010. Most importantly, however, the services are improving quickly and whilst they haven’t achieved the success of Apple’s App Store they are quickly gaining ground.

Despite all the buzz around the iPhone 4 not everyone can afford one. With many compelling alternatives at cheaper price points, Apple faces much stiffer competition than they have faced upon the launch of previous iPhones.

What do you think of the new iPhone 4? Will you be buying one?

  • Share/Bookmark

Expect to see a vibrant and competitive tablet PC market over the next 12 months as Apple sell 2 million iPads globally in less than 60 days.

Apple certainly knows how to get the media and public excited about their latest creation, the iPad. Everyone is talking about the iPad and tablet PCs and this is not just tech press but also mainstream news bulletins. Apple is extremely proficient at sparking people’s imagination around all the creative ways their products, iPhone and iPad, can be used. Apple’s famous strapline for the iPhone was “there’s an app for that” which creates a powerful perception that anything is possible, and the same applies on the iPad.

Whilst Apple have created an enormous buzz around tablet PCs and educated the market as to all the potential uses, competitors will be launching rival products to compete with Apple’s iPad. In the next 12 months we’ll see a plethora of tablet PCs launched from a number of different manufacturers, running a number of different operating systems, from Microsoft Windows to various open source based platforms such as Android and MeeGo (Intel and Nokia joint venture).

The tablet PC market will be a place where laptop manufacturers and smartphone providers really start to compete head to head. At the smartphone end of the market expect to see Nokia, Blackberry and HP (running newly acquired Palm OS) launch alternatives to the iPad. At the PC end of the market the first entrant will be the Dell Streak which will quickly follow the iPad launch in mid June. Asus and Lenovo also have tablet PCs in the pipeline, which will most likely be based on Windows 7. Google won’t be left behind and will launch either an Android or even a Chrome OS based tablet during the course of the year.

With all the different tablet PCs, consumers will be spoilt for choice. Looking at the main three operating systems, Apple mobile OS, Windows 7 and Android/Chrome OS, each company will take a slightly different approach which will add great variety for consumers. For example, Google will be pushing for more of a cloud-based solution, Apple will be heavily app and services based while Microsoft will be evolving their traditional Windows based platform that everyone is familiar with.

As tablet PCs become more popular the netbook market will take a further nosedive. In July 2009 the netbook market grew an astonishing 641% but in April 2010 it grew only 5%, a remarkable fall from grace.

So if netbooks fall victim to tablet PCs, who will benefit?

Well, the iPad was launched in the UK last Friday and today Apple announced that they have sold more than 2 million units globally. According to GfK NOP Technology research Apple are expected to sell up to 2 million 1st generation iPads in the UK if they can meet high levels of early demand. The pricing of the iPad varies and is available as Wi-Fi only models as well as 3G devices from the major UK operators. Apple will almost certainly occupy the more premium end of the market, with competitor tablets likely to be more cost effective. However, price is not the only determining factor for success. The provider who can package up content and services that make tablets easy to use and relevant to the consumer will be the ones who come out on top.

Apple has proven credentials when it comes to delivering multi-media services and apps to their users. They’re not standing still either as Apple launched the iBookstore on the iPad which has already sold 1.5 million ebooks in the US. But even in the services market, competition is strong. Expect to see compelling service offerings from Google, Nokia, RIM (Blackberry) and HP Palm, all of which produce excellent hardware and are quickly improving their services and access to vibrant market places for 3rd party apps.

If competitor tablets can get their service offerings right we can expect to see a very competitive and exciting tablet market in the next 12 months.

FURTHER READING

Apple struggling to cope with demand

http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/personal_tech/article7134564.ece

Operator tariff prices

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/may/10/o2-reveals-ipad-data-plans

2 million iPads sold globally

http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/31/apple-sold-2-million-ipads-in-59-days/

RESEARCH NOTES

GfK NOP Technology conducted a survey among 1279 UK adults between 16th and 21st April 2010. The interviews were conducted online and are representative on UK adults who have access to the internet.

IMAGE SOURCE

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jliba/

  • Share/Bookmark

Smartphone technology paves the way for the market to adopt greener approaches. Encouraging greater use of mobile services helps to limit the need for multiple devices, extend the product lifecycle and offer consumers more ways of being green.

“Technology companies can never be green”. A casual comment dropped into conversation when discussing the idea of ‘green technology’. Of course, ‘green technology’ already exists in the form of multi-million pound, global scale projects that help reclaim water, produce renewable energy and generally help meet global climate change targets. Green technology, as it stands, does not mean the ‘greening’ of technology.

Making technology a little greener would mean creating a shift in the way that technology products – consumer ones that is – are used and consumed. My argument is  that the first steps to any greening of the consumer technology space would be lengthening the product lifecycle. Today, the very nature of the market tells a tale of rapid uptake and obsoleteness; parts break or newer, quicker, more innovative versions come along leaving many devices left for good old Mr. Landfill. Looking at the wider consumer landscape, which is successfully adopting greener behaviour, it seems like the right time for technology to adapt.


Recent data from a GfK NOP Technology survey amongst a representative sample of UK adults* which asked about attitudes towards everyday technology products like MP3s, PCs and mobile phones revealed that obsoleteness is not a desirable feature. When it comes to mobile phones specifically, more than half (56%) say that they are more interested in keeping their device for longer. This offers an opportunity for the rapidly growing mobile services industry. More on this later.

The finding is reflective of wider concerns about the environment and suggests a growing demand for a greener technology market. In particular, 41% of consumers want to know more about what their mobile phone brand or network is doing to be more green in order to help make decisions about future purchases. Consumers now have more choices than ever before to help ‘being green’ more easy, but whether technology products can add to the offering remains to be seen.

Enter the smartphone, which according to Gartner, Inc saw sales growth of 48.7% across the global market in the first quarter of 2010. Smartphones bring mobile services to the lives of consumers which Mobile Marketer estimate will be worth $1 trillion by 2013. Services available through smartphone technology are already a valuable commodity for global technology companies including Apple, Microsoft, Google and Nokia who, despite raging patent war,s are rolling apps, music, messaging, maps and other everyday ‘services’ the mass market might desire over 3G and wireless networks.

The benefits of mobile services extend beyond helping consumers rely more on their mobile phones. In particular, our research reveals that 40% of consumers are more interested in updating the services they use on their mobile phone than the device itself. This figure is not only music to the ears of software developers, network providers and mobile manufacturers who are diversifying into this services market, but also to consumers looking for more ways of being green. Services can extend the product lifecycle through satisfying a wide variety of consumer needs when it comes to technology. They can be updated and replaced regularly and help transform mobile devices into a highly personalised experience. Not only this, but due to the way that they bring a variety of functions together, e.g. camera, music player, clock, etc, they reduce the need for multiple technology devices. All of which contributes a ’greener’ technology market.

However, mobile services can not only help limit environmental impact of products, they also encourage and enable greener consumer behaviour and offer more choices for a greener lifestyle. Nokia, the world’s leading mobile manufacturer, is helping demonstrate how. Kirsi Sormunen, Vice President of Nokia Environmental Affairs, says that the company is continuously looking at “new ways in which mobile technology can contribute to sustainable development,” as well as “ inviting consumers to the journey towards sustainability.” To support this they have created a series of videos demonstrating and hinting at ways that using a mobile phone with internet access is yet another way of ‘being green’.

The videos show mobile phones helping us to help the environment through reducing travel, browsing the internet and carrying an all-in-one device. Nokia is not new to the move to making technology more green. The company came top in Greenpeace’s guide to consumer electronics earlier in the year. Their progression from making the manufacture of handsets more green to making the relationship between consumers and their devices more green, is an encouraging move for the technology market.

With the rapid uptake of smartphones, according to Gartner Inc figures, 54.3 million units globally are already helping people use their mobile phones to access the internet and services, limiting the need for multiple and separate devices. A green revolution in consumer technology has already begun, particularly where consumers want to keep their mobile devices for longer. Despite the global giants of Google and Apple being the pioneers of smartphone technology, it is companies like Nokia who have already realised the environmental benefits of mobile services who are paving the way for the greening of technology.

FURTHER READING

http://www.nokia.com/corporate-responsibility/environment/case-studies/green-products

http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-up/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+CrikeyDaily+(Crikey+Daily)

More from GfK on green issues from Roper Consulting:

http://www.gfkroperpulse.co.uk/

RESEARCH NOTES

GfK NOP Technology conducted a survey among 862 UK adults in March 2010. The interviews were conducted online and are representative on UK adults who have access to the internet.

IMAGE SOURCE:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/matthijs// / CC by 2.0

  • Share/Bookmark

The future of 6 Music may be decided later this month; a recent survey suggests that keeping the station alive should form part of the BBC’s duty, regardless of whether recent publicity has engaged a sufficiently large enough audience to justify its existence to the number crunchers.

Over the last few months BBC 6 Music has successfully managed to do something it previously had not been notable for; namely commanding a significant share of radio listeners and attracting correspondingly high levels of media and public interest. (According to recently released RAJAR figures* the digital station was up 47% on the previous quarter and 50% on the year, bringing it to a total of 1.02m listeners in Q1 2010.)

The catalyst for this growth certainly appears to be the leak back in February that the BBC was considering shutting the station down, officially confirmed by a Mark Thompson announcement in March; a move which has resulted in public outcry, a protest outside Broadcasting House, with another planned for 22 May and huge media publicity.

As an aside, given that the news broke with only a month of the first quarter to go, one could argue that 6 Music’s listening figures might actually be higher than RAJAR (who calculate an average across the quarter) have reported. If the leaked closure of the station is indeed the catalyst to huge growth, it will be interesting to see what the figures look like in Q2 – can we expect the ‘save the station’ campaign to drive the station’s listenership up to as high as 1.5 million, perhaps?

Either way, the corporation has certainly achieved the recommendation of the BBC Trust that 6 Music should increase its profile (albeit accidentally.) In many ways, this whole episode has been similar to a parent dealing with a stubborn child who refuses to eat its dinner; people only became interested in the station when it was threatened to be taken away.

While only a small number of people actually listened to 6 Music before, it seems what has really captured public interest is the principle behind the announcement, which is felt to run counter to the BBC’s remit. Indeed, a number of campaigns to save 6 Music are championing the station’s minority status as a clear justification why it should keep running. As, BBC Radio 5 Live presenter Chris Addison was quoted as saying: “6 Music serves a minority interest, does it? Then it’s heartland BBC.*”

Recent data from a GfK NOP Technology survey amongst a representative sample of UK residents with internet access further supports this case.

The survey revealed that the majority of UK adults were not specifically concerned about the closure of 6 Music (or the Asian network, another threatened station); with only around a fifth (18%) stating they had any direct interest in the closure. This is not entirely surprising, given that 6 Music is very much a niche station (in comparison, Radio 1 attracted approximately 11.7 million listeners in the last quarter.)

However, what does emerge clearly is a view on what the public feel the BBC should be delivering: 53% of adults agree that the BBC “has a duty to fulfil the needs of niche interest groups in the UK”, a figure which rises to 60% amongst 16 – 34 year olds.

Furthermore, 64% agree that the BBC’s roster should be diverse enough to “satisfy all wider ranging interests, both mainstream and niche”. Again, amongst 16-34 year olds, this rises to almost 70%.

These wider ranging interests are exactly what the likes of 6 Music deliver; a place to get to new, exciting music that will never be covered by mainstream stations. Of course, as the Trust pointed out in its review last year, the BBC has to prioritise expenditure and in order to justify its existence it is not enough to simply broadcast, the station must deliver an audience to the content. However, I can’t help but feel there’s a middle ground here – why should ‘popular’ (as opposed to classical) music stations always have to resort to lowest common denominator playlists? – in my opinion, removing such diversity is against what we pay the licence fee for and I would hope there would be room for both.

Furthermore, although it was somewhat accidental, the BBC has in many ways done what it set out to do (cater to a niche market, enhance creative offerings and engage a bigger audience.) So, while listening figures tell one story, this episode also highlights the importance of the BBC to engage with audiences, in order to stimulate debate, campaign and a greater sense of ‘civic-ness’ first.

While it’s perhaps not the best time to be quoting Gordon Brown, the ex-prime minister recently summed up quite eloquently why I feel the BBC must accommodate 6 Music in its budget once the BBC Trust consultation exercise comes to its decision on 25 May.

When asked whether he was in favour of keeping the station, Mr Brown stated: “Yes because it’s the next stage you worry about. A lot of things that the BBC does are incredibly creative and quite risky…
…But this is a necessary means of us being a creative society.”


Want to read more?

There are many excellent, heart-felt articles about this issue. Here are a selection:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2010/feb/27/bbc-to-cancel-6-music
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/mar/07/6-music-asian-network-review

* Sources for used figures & quotations:
http://www.rajar.co.uk/listening/quarterly_listening.php
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/feb/26/bbc-6-music-opposition-closure
http://www.nme.com/news/lady-gaga/50636

RESEARCH NOTES:

GfK NOP Technology conducted a survey among 862 UK adults in March 2010. The interviews were conducted online and are representative on UK adults who have access to the internet.

Image from…

  • Share/Bookmark

IPTV is no longer tied to commercial bundles of high speed internet access, television and telephone (triple play), but the success of the technology continues to be dependent upon the strength of the home broadband connection.

The uptake of triple play offerings in the UK is somewhat sluggish compared with the US and other EU markets. However, along with the two established players, Sky (satellite) and Virgin (cable), the adoption of high speed broadband internet connection over recent years has led to the rise of various forms of bundled and unbundled internet protocol television (IPTV) services.

For the purpose of this article, IPTV as a term includes subscriber-based offerings requiring the installation of set-top boxes (eg BT Vision, TalkTalk TV, etc.), but also free or commercial services that offer some sort of live television, time-shifted TV programmes, and video on demand (eg BBC i-Player, ITV Player, Channel 4 on demand (4oD), YouTube, LOVEFILM etc.) relying on other customer-premises equipment (CPE).

With CPEs, aside from the traditional definition (ie a router bundled with an internet connection, a mobile handset as part of a contract with a mobile provider, etc.), it makes sense to include any internet-enabled, end-user equipment that consumers use to view any of the forms of IPTV mentioned previously. As such, recent research* by GfK NOP Technology division indicates that 80% of the UK internet population watch IPTV and are using primarily the following CPEs:

An emerging trend here is the role of the TV set as a CPE device. Further more, isolating the fact that there is a good portion of the population (25%) who use their flat panel TV set to view IPTV, the same research identfies that the top three ways to do so are:

  • By connecting to a pc/laptop – 38%
  • Via a game console – 22%
  • Directly connected to a broadband router – 16%

Interestingly, the list does not include services that rely on a set-top box installation (Virgin is in fourth place – 11%, while BT Vision has only a very small penetration – 2%). In addition, internet-enabled TVs, only available since 2009 in the UK, appear to make an interesting category.

Having seen consumers bypassing the standard triple play offerings in terms of CPEs, the next question is what type of content they choose to watch over internet?

Our research indicates that amongst all people who watch video content over the internet, free IPTV services such as BBC i-Player, YouTube, 4oD and ITV Player, are the highest used, while premium services, like iTunes, Sky TV and Virgin Media fall behind:

In this situation, it is not surprising that triple play offerings (eg Sky and Virgin) are already including, or are starting to include, these popular video on demand services (i.e. BBC i-Player, YouTube, etc.) as part of their offering. Nevertheless, some might question why they should buy into triple play rather than just get an internet enabled TV in order to watch the most popular and free IPTV services such as BBC i-Player?

Leading TV manufacturers are all starting to offer this type of functionality – Panasonic with its VieraCast system, Philips – NetTV, Samsung – internet@tv, Sony – applicast, etc – and are making an effort to incorporate popular IPTV services into their internet widgets. However, the technology relies on the quality of the home broadband connection, without any control over the “last mile”, or guarantee over the quality of service that a commercial triple play provider can offer. This might sound trivial, but our survey also confirms that satisfaction with IPTV when considering connectivity/speed and image resolution is only moderate at 62% and 66% respectively.

Nonetheless, consumers today have increasingly more options to watch IPTV and this can only be a good thing. The challenge should lie with the providers of IPTV services and CPEs to leverage the technological advantages and create new opportunities. Triple play providers should not perceive this evolving nature of IPTV as a threat, but as something that can help boost its uptake in the UK market.

Research Info
*1000 online interviews were conducted by GfK NOP among a UK representative sample of internet users. The fieldwork was conducted in March 2010

  • Share/Bookmark