If you read our post regarding 3D TV and want to check it out yourself, here’s a list of pubs showing the game in 3D:

If you do watch the game in 3D we’d love to know what you think, just let us know in the comments.

Enjoy!

NB. List courtesy of geeks.co.uk

  • Share/Bookmark

GfK NOP research shows good levels of interest in 3D TV amongst adult consumers. The main barriers to adoption will eventually disappear, but are likely to stall early widespread adoption.

One of the recurring items in the numerous “predicted technology trends for 2010” lists that emerged at the start of the year was 3D TV.

The interest in 3D technology has been steadily growing over the last couple of years with various films being re-released in, or designed specifically for, 3D viewing, not least James Cameron’s epic Avatar and its accompanying high budget hype machine, which exploded the awareness of the technology with the masses and smashed box-office records.

With Sky’s live broadcast of Manchester United vs. Arsenal this weekend signalling the first live 3D sporting broadcast on TV and acting as a showpiece for Sky’s 3D service that will be available from April, it’s fair to say that 3D  is now firmly entering the realm of the consumer.

Of course, for consumers to experience this revolution at home it will require the appropriate hardware.  A number of companies, including Sony, ESPN and DirecTV, made 3D TV announcements at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, but whether people will be willing to spend on this technology in the near future is yet to be seen, particularly given that many consumers recently invested in high-definition sets.

That said, research*conducted by GfK NOP in January amongst a representative sample of internet users, shows that interest levels in 3DTV are relatively high, with  42% of adults expressing interest (somewhat or extremely) in buying a 3D TV.

This is not to say that interest will necessarily convert into purchase in the short term, but it does suggest there is certainly some potential; interest rises to 50% amongst males, 50% amongst those who are single and to 61% amongst those aged 16-24…offering a pretty clear indication of the target audience.

Convincing consumers…
But what of those less interested? What are the barriers which Sky and the TV manufacturers are going to have to confront to push 3D TV into the mainstream?

Just under a fifth of those not interested simply state that they don’t like the idea of 3D TV. A further 7% state that too much 3D viewing gives them a headache – fine for a one-off engaging film experience perhaps, but while the dizzying spectacle of a 3D experience within the context of a 2 hour trip to the cinema is one thing, will there really be the same desire to be immersing oneself fully in a 3D Albert Square experience with EastEnders evening after evening?

Another concern is the perceived ‘gimmicky’ nature of the proposition; while some films (such as Avatar) are uniquely suited to exploit the technology to its fullest, there is some scepticism about the benefit of routinely applying 3D to all films/ programming- particularly if focussing on the ‘wow factor’ of the technology is to the detriment of the considerations of plot or fully rounded character development. And this is before we even get to the glasses…

Ah yes, the glasses. 47% of consumers not interested in the concept state that the need to wear glasses would dissuade them from purchasing a 3D television (the biggest barrier in the research). Generally speaking, for some consumers the process of having to put on a pair of glasses will seem somewhat unnatural, as well as adding another peripheral to clutter up and lose in the sitting room. In addition, there’s also the unsettling experience of walking into your local pub and seeing a room full of football fanatics decked out like extras from the Matrix.

Of course, these barriers will inevitably disappear over time as the technology develops (and we hopefully lose the glasses), prices drop and consumers start to thinking about replacing their current HD-TV.  As an example, while 39% of adults feel that there isn’t enough content to make purchasing a 3D TV worthwhile, Sky are already taking the first steps this Sunday to introduce appealing content; something which will only continue over time.

Furthermore, there is potentially huge appeal for 3D TV amongst video gamers to fully immerse themselves in a 3D environment. (This is something we hope to research over the next couple of months in more detail.)

So, all things considered, it is our opinion that 2010 will not be the year of consumer 3D TV in home. At present 3D TV seems to sit more comfortably as an ‘event’ experience (i.e. a James Cameron sci-fi opera, or a critical fixture in the sporting calendar) rather than something to enjoy on a daily basis at home – and with this limitation in mind, it’s debatable whether many consumers, outside of the early adopters or those with plenty of disposable income, will make the investment in the short term.


NOTES

*1000 online interviews were conducted by GfK NOP among a UK representative sample of internet users.

Image from…

  • Share/Bookmark

GfK NOP research shows that consumers familiar with the iPhone are much more interested in tablet PCs than the average UK consumer and, what’s more, they know exactly what they would use it for.


One of the hot topics at this year’s CES (Consumer Electronics Show) was tablet PCs. Microsoft showed off Windows 7 (multi-touch version) on an HP tablet and, despite Apple’s non-attendance, there was much hype around a potential ‘iPad’ (iSlate, iTablet?). Many believe that the hype will become a reality on 27 January when Apple hosts an event entitled ‘Come see our latest creation’.


What interests me most about tablet PCs is who would buy one and what they would do with it. Recent research*conducted by GfK NOP shows that interest levels in ‘tablet PCs’ for the average UK internet user are at moderate levels with 45% being somewhat or extremely interested. That may sound high, but with all research like this, sales never match intent. However, the most striking finding from this research is that levels of interest are significantly higher among iPhone users – at 75%.

Those Interested in Tablet PCs

Why such a big difference? Well, iPhone users will be familiar with features such as multi-touch screens, integrated multimedia services and, of course, the App Store. This, in itself, begins to reveal what consumers will use a tablet PC for. In a way it is obvious for an iPhone user that an iPad (let’s go with that name for now) would be a larger, more powerful iPhone, which would be a natural choice for web browsing and multimedia as well as being extremely customisable with apps. The research supports this view because of those interested in tablet PCs, 58% of iPhone users (41% UK average) said they would use it for an ‘enhanced’ web browsing experience and 75% of iPhone users (41% UK average) said they would use it as a portable multimedia player, two of the top answers.

However, web browsing and multimedia are standard features for PC, laptop or even netbook users, so will the introduction of the tablet PC enable new and different uses? Reading between the lines, Apple’s invite (pictured below), with the splashes of paint used in the imagery, might suggest that a future iPad will be a more effective platform for creative tasks. Over half of iPhone users interested in tablet PCs (51%) said they would use it for ‘mainly creative tasks like editing photos or drawing images’ compared to just 27% as a UK average. Although tasks like these are becoming more mainstream, the tablet PC, especially an Apple one, could accelerate that trend.

Potential effect of tablet PCs
For some time now, people have been calling for Apple to release a netbook, mainly because many wanted a portable Apple experience with web browsing and multimedia capabilities. In a way the iPhone has filled this void but a future iPad could take the experience one step further and, as we’ve seen, iPhone users agree. The obvious difference is that a netbook and a tablet PC will sit at different ends of the affordability scale. Apple’s products are always at the premium end of the market and are about delivering a simple and high performance user experience. A tablet PC has the potential to meet all of those criteria without devaluing their product pricing or risking customer satisfaction as they may have done with a netbook. With this is mind, I can now see why they resisted netbooks and waited for tablet PCs despite the prolific sales netbooks received over the past few years.

Whether tablet PCs will have an effect on netbook sales is hard to tell, especially as they will (almost definitely) be at least twice the price of a netbook. One risk Apple and other PC manufacturers might face is the cannibalisation of home laptop sales. Of those interested in tablet PCs, 60% of iPhone users (48% UK average) said they would use it to replace all the tasks of their home PC or laptop. This is not as unbelievable as it first sounds given that the majority of home internet users (58%) only use their PC for basic tasks like browsing the internet.**

It’s no wonder so many people are excited about the potential of a future iPad being announced later this week. Apple have an incredible knack at educating consumers about their new products before anyone has even seen what they look like. They did the same with the iPhone; Apple let the market speculate about what it would look like and what it would do before it was even announced. The success of the iPhone has sparked consumer interest in the iPad and the same seems to be happening again. For iPhone users in particular an iPad is simply a complimentary and natural evolution of the iPhone.

So, will the tablet become as common an item on the coffee table as a magazine or a book?… We’ll have to wait and see! Roll on 27 January!

NOTES ON THE RESEARCH

*1000 online interviews were conducted by GfK NOP among a UK representative sample of internet users.
  • Share/Bookmark